2023 CGIAR Annual
Report

In 2023, CGIAR and its valued partners around the world continued to pioneer and deliver solutions addressing the most urgent challenges, while partnering to deliver and scale impact.”

Leaders' Message

Advancing Nutrition, Health, and Food Security

CGIAR Executive Managing Director Ismahane Elouafi and CGIAR System Board Chair Lindiwe Majele Sibanda highlight 2023 key achievements, and preview the report’s theme of nutrition, health, and food security.

Portfolio & Results

Our 2023 Annual Report highlights the significant strides made by CGIAR in our ongoing mission to transform food, land, and water systems in a climate crisis. This year’s report theme focuses on a critical aspect central to our goals: nutrition, health, and food security. Please explore our results across our three Science Groups (and their 32 Research Initiatives), Regional Integrated Initiatives, our coordinating Impact Areas, and our Research Centers.

Key results stories

Center Success Stories

Impact Areas

In collaboration with around 3,000 partners, CGIAR advances the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by targeting five key Impact Areas. Each Impact Area Platform focuses on research and innovation aimed at achieving significant, enduring, and scalable impacts.

Our Impact in Numbers

Slide for more impacts

Nutrition

people

2.1 million people

Over 2.1 million people in 2023 used CGIAR innovations to support nutrition, health, and food security. 

business

1,786 partners

We worked with 1,786 partners to combat hunger and malnutrition, and improve well-being. 

results

2,942 results

Our research produced 2,942 results contributing to better health, and enhanced food and nutrition security. 

innovation

464 innovations

We produced 464 innovations to support health and combat hunger. 

Climate

people

22.4 million people

More than 22.4 million people used CGIAR innovations to mitigate or adapt to climate change. This included more than 1.3 million and 1.8 million men. 

business

1,887 partners

Up to 1,887 partners were engaged on climate-focused results at the ground level. 

results

4,505 results

Our scientists produced more than 4,505 results that contributed to SDG 13 on Climate Action, including publications, analyses and methods. 

innovation

548 climate solutions

At least 548 field-ready climate solutions were shared to help smallholders adapt to climate change and reduce emissions from agriculture. 

Environment

people

1.2 million people

Over 1.2 million people used CGIAR innovations to improve environmental health and biodiversity. 

business

1,813 partners

A total of 1,813 partners worked with us on supporting conservation of biodiversity and a healthy environment. 

results

2,460 results

Our researchers produced 2,460 results contributing to SDGs 14 and 15 on life below water, and life on land.

innovation

504 new innovations

Our researchers produced around 504 new innovations to support environmental health and biodiversity worldwide.

Gender

people

16 million people

More than 16 million people used CGIAR innovations to support gender equality, youth, and social inclusion. 

business

1,594 partners

Up to 1,594 partners were engaged with efforts for equality and inclusion on the ground. 

results

1,028 results

As many as 1028 results were recorded that contributed to SDG 10 on reduced inequalities. 

innovation

413 innovations

Research produced around 413 innovations supporting greater equality between men and women, and inclusion of youth and other minorities in food systems. 

Poverty

people

21 million people

Over 21 million people used CGIAR innovations to support poverty reduction, livelihoods and jobs.

business

1,821 partners

As many as 1,821 partners worked with us on transforming food systems to provide better jobs, income, and stable livelihoods. 

results

4,767 results

We recorded up to 4,767 results that contributed to SDG 1 on ending poverty in all its forms. 

innovation

394 innovations

Our research produced 394 innovations to reduce poverty and improve livelihoods. 

Regions & Partnerships

With around 3,000 partners, collaboration is essential to CGIAR’s approach. We work with small-scale farmers and associations, national universities and governments, global networks, and more. CGIAR engages across six key regions, aligning its strengths with regional needs. Please also explore an expanded focus on two key countries: Ghana and Guatemala.

Regions

Partnerships

Countries Focus

Digital Transformation

CGIAR integrates cutting-edge digital solutions into our scientific innovations. And we use digital technologies to enable our business units and research programs. In 2023, we made substantial advances in deploying digital solutions that will help us tackle global challenges.

Events & Awards

Explore a selection of CGIAR Centers and researchers awarded for their outstanding work, along with highlights from our key global event participation in 2023.

Our Operations

Our operations teams are committed to ensuring CGIAR is a value-driven, high-performing organization. In 2023, CGIAR made progress ensuring we are an inclusive and enabling organization, a transparent financial manager, and an effective manager of digital and data assets.

Oversight & Assurance

CGIAR’s Advisory Services, Internal Audit, and Ethics & Business Conduct teams are crucial in ensuring that best practices are maintained within our organization and in our external collaborations.

Dumplings and Development: Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index

by Emily Myers, Senior Research Analyst, Poverty, Gender, and Inclusion Unit, IFPRI; Eleanor Jones, Research Analyst, Director General’s Office, IFPRI; and Hazel Malapit, Senior Research Coordinator, Poverty, Gender, and Inclusion Unit, IFPRI

This blog post is part of a special monthly series entitled “Making a Difference,” documenting the impact of IFPRI’s projects and initiatives. These stories reflect the wide breadth of the Institute’s research, communications, and capacity-strengthening activities around the world, in fulfillment of its mission. The blog series has been peer-reviewed by IFPRI’s Impact Committee members.

Dumplings are one of the most universally adaptable foods. The basic template of dough and filling, customized with local ingredients, flavors, and traditions, is found in almost every country: Gyoza in Japan, momo in Nepal, varenyky in Ukraine, empanadas in Spain and Latin America, to name just a few.

The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) is a survey tool that aims to emulate a similar kind of versatility when used in different regions and contexts. WEAI measures the inclusion of women in the agricultural sector, which has been gaining greater recognition as women are of crucial importance for overall growth and development.

Before WEAI, existing tools for measuring impact on women’s empowerment were limited, contributing to less attention on empowerment relative to other more easily measurable outcomes. Following the adage of “you can’t improve what you don’t measure,” WEAI not only facilitates more widespread measurement of empowerment but has also contributed to the growing number of initiatives to enhance women’s empowerment in the agricultural sector.

The WEAI findings from the Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS) demonstrate that women’s empowerment can improve agricultural diversity, nutrition, and poverty outcomes. The results of this study were used to design a three-year pilot project called the Agriculture, Nutrition, and Gender Linkages (ANGeL) Project. Overall, since its inception, WEAI has been adopted by over 249 organizations across 60 countries.

To measure the inclusion of women in agriculture, WEAI uses a core set of empowerment indicators, including aspects such as control over the use of income, workload, and autonomy in production. The indicators fall within five domains — Production, Resources, Income, Leadership, and Time — allowing women and men’s empowerment to be compared across and within contexts.

However, a key feature of WEAI is that each user can use a different WEAI “recipe” to fit the local context and tastes – tool users can utilize different modules and indicators in addition to the standard “ingredients,” allowing the index to provide better measurement and contextualization. Just as dumplings can be prepared in a variety of ways to incorporate the flavors of a specific culture, WEAI users may toggle between its unique features to best fit their study setting and research needs.

Building on WEAI’s success

WEAI was launched in 2012 and has become a well-known standard for measuring shifts in women’s and men’s empowerment. Over the years, the WEAI team has hosted numerous training events and capacity-strengthening workshops, engaging with stakeholders and policymakers to ensure the index’s effective implementation.

Over the past decade, the WEAI has grown into a suite of quantitative and qualitative tools suited for different user needs. The greater the variety of versions of the WEAI tool, the more tailored and impactful WEAI can be for its users.

Jumping off from the success of the original tool, the WEAI team created the abbreviated WEAI (A-WEAI), also designed for population-based surveys, but with fewer indicators to shorten interview time and modified questions to ease field implementation, while maintaining cross-cultural applicability.

Next came a version for impact assessments of agricultural development projects: The project-level WEAI, or pro-WEAI. It takes a slightly different approach to measuring empowerment.

Pro-WEAI

Pro-WEAI was created using a portfolio approach comprising 13 agricultural development projects from Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, India, Kenya, Mali, Nepal, and Tanzania. Instead of using five domains of empowerment to categorize its indicators, as in the original WEAI, pro-WEAI uses three types of agency: intrinsic (power within), instrumental (power to), and collective agency (power with).

Pro-WEAI includes both quantitative and qualitative methods. The survey instrument computes empowerment scores for women and men, as well as gender parity. The standard qualitative protocols include a review of project documents, a community profile, focus group discussions on local meanings of empowerment, semi-structured life history interviews with program beneficiaries, and key informant interviews with program staff, and key members of the community. Combining these quantitative and qualitative methods provides the ability to glean nuance in interpreting variation across and within country and regional contexts.

The pro-WEAI … is a great step forward. For example, at HKI, we have a focus on maternal nutrition and health; seeing new indicators that are more specific around nutrition, or measure things like intra-household relationships, has been great. - Ramona Ridolfi Regional Gender Advisor, Asia Pacific Office, Helen Keller International

However, different projects have different goals — this is where the “dumpling approach” comes into play. Additional indicators were created to be added to the pro-WEAI standard “ingredients” to allow the index to better measure and contextualize empowerment in alignment with a project’s specific goals.

Language and context can vary a lot, and even when you get the quantitative scores, it can be difficult to interpret without the qualitative piece to help explain. We explicitly designed pro-WEAI from the beginning to use a mixed methods approach. - Hazel Malapit Senior Research Coordinator, IFPRI

In 2019 on International Day of Rural Women, Hazel Malapit, Senior Research Coordinator at the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) and A4NH's Gender Research Coordinator, and Ramona Ridolfi, Regional Gender Advisor, Asia Pacific Office, Helen Keller International, sat down to discuss the project-level Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI) and what it has meant for efforts towards supporting rural women worldwide.

Extra Pro-WEAI ingredients

Health and Nutrition Module

The pro-WEAI health and nutrition module (pro-WEAI+HN) measures women’s agency in health and nutrition-related decisions and sustainable access to adequate food and health products. IFPRI researchers developed indicators for this module by analyzing pilot data collected in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, and Mali. These indicators provide a broader measure of women’s agency and decision-making. Measuring whether women can make decisions about healthcare, for example, can help project implementers better understand the type of agency most relevant to nutrition-sensitive agriculture programs and which elements can improve program outcomes.

Market Inclusion Module

The market inclusion module (pro-WEAI+MI) adds complementary ingredients to the pro-WEAI dumpling. Pilot studies for the module were performed in Bangladesh, the Philippines, Benin, and Malawi. This module investigates the empowerment of women and men across agricultural value chains, barriers to market access, and inclusion for different value chain actors. Optional indicators in the module measure access to reliable sanitation, sexual hostility in the working environment, and decision-making power in primary value chains.

I am capable of doing it [farming, going to the market to shop, getting a loan] myself so far. I do everything on my own will. There is none to stop me or to hold me back from doing what I do. - Woman in Bangladesh Pilot participant

Choosing the right recipe

If you are going to make dumplings, it’s best to see what different recipes are available. To help pick out the right recipe, the WEAI team developed an interactive tool guiding users through a series of questions to identify the best version for the intended purpose. This array of ingredients available for the pro-WEAI, and ability to choose the best ones for a given project, allows project leaders to gain better insights into women’s empowerment in diverse locations and cultures. The latest versions, guidelines, qualitative protocols, and publications can be found at the WEAI Resource Center.

Read the original story by IFPRI